Camunda vs activiti. ClemensTan April 8, 2020, 6:34am 4.

Camunda vs activiti Have a look at below link I know this question might sound very vague, but on a very high level, is there a comparison made between Camunda vs any other BPMN tools like jBPM or Activiti or BonitaSoft or so onin terms of moving the application from one tool to the other. I would prefer a ve Camunda Forum Comparison between Activiti and Camunda. Camunda has a rating of 4. However What’s the difference between Activiti, Apache Airflow, and Camunda? Compare Activiti vs. I'm doing a comparison between Camunda and Activiti as a part of a feasibility study. 3k次，点赞3次，收藏22次。本文对比了jBPM、Activiti、Flowable和Camunda这四个开源流程引擎，它们同源于jBPM4。jBPM5以后版本基于DroolsFlow，但接口混乱，不建议使用；Activiti由Alfresco开发，但版本复杂，6及5版本已停止维护；Flowable是Activiti6的分支，有商业版支持；Camunda基于Activiti5，保留PVM Based on verified reviews from real users in the Business Process Automation Tools market. Its core is a super-fast and rock-solid BPMN Compare Activiti vs. X版本的时候放弃了PVM，Flowable亦是如此）。 Is Zeebe core expected to become Camunda 8. Camunda vs. For example, if there is a workflow service project that was built using jBPM and now if we have to migrate it to I’m doing a comparison between Camunda and Activiti as a part of a feasibility study. compared to Camunda vs Flowable. Hi @mrrosenthal85. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. community vs. Best Activiti的扩展能力相对较弱，可能不太适合需要高度定制的项目。 性能 性能是选择流程引擎时需要考虑的重要因素。 Camunda和Flowable在同等条件下具有相似的表现，而Activiti可能不如前两者。特别是在高并发场景下，Camunda通常表现更稳定。 文章浏览阅读618次。市场上比较有名的开源流程引擎有osworkflow、jbpm、activiti、flowable、camunda。其中：Jbpm4、Activiti、Flowable、camunda四个框架同宗同源，祖先都是Jbpm4，开发者只要用过其中一个框架，基本上就会用其它三个。低代码平台、办公自动化（OA）、BPM平台、工作流系统均需要流程引擎功能 I'm doing a comparison between Camunda and Activiti as a part of a feasibility study. Activiti：Activiti在目前来看有点不思进取，核心功能和内核的优化并没有太大进步，着力点全在商业版和云上面，核心只支持BPMN2协议，跟6版本没有什么区别。 如果你是一个老的Activiti使 Compare Activiti vs. Camunda vs Flowable Platform. Camunda 7 Topics. It's open-source and distributed under the Apache license. The objective of this post is to illustrate the diverging directions the two projects have taken and to serve as input for users who now consider migrating from Activiti to activiti这个引擎,java开发者在熟悉不过了,这里就不说了,但是功能较少,很多功能都需要自行开发,个人不太喜欢用 比较1:是否收费 activiti7:不收费开源 去官网没看到需要收费的信息 Camunda: 收费 官网有明显的收费信息 flowable: 收费 官网有明显的收费信息 比较2 文章浏览阅读7w次，点赞25次，收藏87次。flowable camunda activiti 三个框架都是从jbpm框架诞生出来的，先是有jbpm4,然后出来了一个activiti5,activiti5发展一段时间，又出来了一个Camunda。activiti5发展了4年，紧接着出来了一个flowable。本文重点对flowable camunda两个框架的功能对比。 Compare Activiti vs. More and more Activiti users want to migrate to Camunda. MindCloud is a software company that builds and maintains custom connections between your software and other platforms so you can eliminate manual data 除Alfresco以外，Activiti最大的贡献者之一的公司Camunda表示Activiti可能太拘束于Alfresco对以文档为中心的工作流的需求(这个也是BPMN约束使然)，而忽视了Activiti起步时的更为普遍的BPM平台。camunda宣布他们正从Activiti 分裂出一个新的开源工程，那就是camunda BPM. e. jBPM in 2025 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below. I would prefer a ve Hi @prasadps, I’m afraid we cannot provide the comparison for you for the following reasons: We know our own product much 市场上比较有名的开源流程引擎有osworkflow、jbpm、activiti、flowable、camunda。其中：Jbpm4、Activiti、Flowable、camunda四个框架同宗同源，祖先都是Jbpm4，开发者只要用过其中一个框架，基本上就会用其它三个。osworkflow目前功能简单，目前已处于不活跃状态，此处就 Hello I noticed that the engine creates both Activity instance for a task and a Task they seem like different objects having different identifiers: What would be the correct way to get the variables from the Task through the Rest api? To find the task searching by the activity instance id of the task and then to get the variables from the task? Thanks in advance 笔者从事工作流研发多年，用过osworkflow、jbpm、activiti、flowable、camunda等多个开源流程引擎，后来遇到了camunda，经过功能和性能验证测试，最终选择了camunda，，并在多个项目上进行验证，性能和稳定性表现良好。 参考文章:osworkflow、jbpm、activiti、flowable、camunda开源流程引擎哪个好?_大龄码农有梦想的博客-CSDN博客_流程引擎有哪些 工作流引擎选择（为何使用activiti而不是jbpm）_ClassFoo的博客-CSDN博客_为什么要 Activiti is a light-weight workflow and Business Process Management (BPM) Platform targeted at business people, developers and system admins. Camunda is a fork of Activiti. process-engine What’s the difference between Activiti, Camunda, and n8n? Compare Activiti vs. ClemensTan April 8, 2020, 6:34am 4. Activiti provides a single web app for development and execution. Flowable Engine. Are there any connections left over from the original activiti engine? hassang November 6, 2016, 5:09am 4. Compare Activiti vs. For everybody knowing this module I compiled the changes at the end of this Camunda Forum ActivityBehavior vs JavaDelegate. I have read the post before, but I was wondering, if this applies to Activiti 7 as well, but this is not the scope of the Camunda forum. focusing more more Flowable (V6) vs Camunda BPM Activiti vs Camunda BPM Flowable (V6) vs temporal Activiti vs jbpm Flowable (V6) vs jbpm Activiti vs kogito-runtimes. MindCloud is a software company that builds and maintains custom connections between your software and other platforms so you can eliminate manual data entry and Activiti 7 vs Camunda. 0标准的轻量级业务流程引擎，它使用Java编写，并提供了丰富的API接口。Activiti的核心功能包括流程设计、执行、管理和监 There are plenty of solid Camunda alternatives on the market, such as Activiti (check out our Camunda vs Activiti comparison piece to learn more about the technology), Webcon, etc. CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Since then, we maintained our own open source fork of the original Activiti Codebase. (Activiti, Camunda, Flowable 5), the execution tree has all kinds of Compare Activiti vs. Appian vs. See side-by-side comparisons of product capabilities, customer experience, pros and cons, and reviewer demographics to find the best fit for your organization. Camunda using this comparison chart. 7k次，点赞7次，收藏40次。文章介绍了多个开源流程引擎，如Osworkflow、JBPM、Activiti、Flowable和Camunda的特点和历史。其中，Camunda在功能、性能和稳定性上表现出色，支持BPMN、CMMN、DMN，并提供强大的工具。文章提到了Camunda相对于Flowable的多项优势，并基于性能测试结果推荐使用Camunda作为 Activiti是由原JBPM的创始人Tom Baeyens所创立，它的前身是jBPM4，后经过发展，Activiti5和Activiti6相继问世。Flowable则是Activiti的继任者，由Tijs Rademakers团队开发，继承了Activiti的精髓并进行了改进。Camunda则是一个年轻的开源流程引擎，以其高性能和灵活性得到 No, jBPM is not dying but more simpler and lightweight versions of BPMN are coming out recent days like Camunda, Flowable, Activiti and list goes on. Its core is a super-fast and rock-solid BPMN I really like Camunda, but I need to give some key facts to my stakeholder, why Camunda is better than Activiti. The drawback is, of course, that you and your team will need to learn an entirely new solution – but it just might be worth the effort. Both Camunda and Flowable are forks of Activiti, which is a business process automation tool that is believed to be less versatile and powerful than Camunda. 文章浏览阅读7. 7 stars with 95 reviews. I would appreciate your help if you can enhance my research by Activiti is a light-weight workflow and Business Process Management (BPM) Platform targeted at business people, developers and system admins. Community Feedback. Flowable has a rating of 4. 文章浏览阅读8. Community. Camunda in 2025 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below. Activiti是一个基于BPMN 2. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Activiti) as a part of a feasibility study. Join the Camunda Connect Partner Program and help enterprises transform their digital business with Camunda’s leading Process Orchestration product. Discussion & Questions. I would appreciate your help if you can enhance my research by providing with a quick comparison specially between Camunda & Activiti but i also want to know more about other alternatives. Hi Niall, thank you for your reply. Hello, this might be a frequent asked question, but I couldn’t find anything on google, which is newer than 2017. Flowable in 2025 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, Activiti is a light-weight workflow and Business Process Management (BPM) Platform targeted at business people, developers and system admins. In the community version it is called Activiti Explorer and is very easy and simple to use. 0标准的轻量级业务流程引擎，它使用Java编写，并提供了丰富的API接口。Activiti的核心功能包括流程设计、执行、管理和监 Camunda基于activiti5，所以其保留了PVM，最新版本Camunda7. I would appreciate your help if you enhance my research by providing with a quick comparison between these two. I would prefer a very short comparison listing only important features (distinguishing features like what is possible for one and not for others, licensing, 在Activiti、Flowable和Camunda这三个开源流程引擎中，究竟哪个更适合您的项目呢？本文将为您详细解析。 一、Activiti. Camunda split from the Activiti project in 2013. Bonita vs. Boost productivity With the Activiti Core Developers having left Alfresco (the company behind Activiti), the future of the Activiti project is quite questionable. n8n in 2025 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below. MindCloud is a software company that builds and maintains custom connections between your software and other platforms so you can eliminate manual data entry and 文章浏览阅读5. Choosing between activiti and camunda. It seems flowable is more user friendly, but besides that, Camunda has 27000 ines of code vs Flowable 9000. For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Flowable Platform over Camunda. Flowable in 2025 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below. 综上所述，在选择Activiti、Camunda还是Flowable时，您应根据具体需求进行权衡。如果您注重流程的直观建模和易用性，同时希望有丰富的社区资源和插件库支持，那么Camunda可能是一个不错的选择。如果您需要高性能和可扩展的解决方案，并且对商业支持和服务有较高要求，那么Camunda的商业版或Flowable What’s the difference between Activiti, Camunda, and jBPM? Compare Activiti vs. The future of the Activiti Open Source project is currently uncertain. Thanks! Flowable Compare Flowable Vs Camunda. Reviewers felt that Camunda meets the needs of their business better than Flowable Platform. enterprise) What’s the difference between Activiti and Camunda? Compare Activiti vs. Activiti runs in any Java application, on a server, on a I'm doing a comparison between Camunda & other alternatives (eg. ClemensTan April 7, 2020, 10:28am 1. 不过，在用户体验方面，Flowable可能稍逊于Camunda。 Activiti：Activiti的用户界面相对基础，主要集中在流程设计和管理上。随着项目的发展，一些用户界面相关的功能可能没有得到及时更新。 总的来说，Camunda、Flowable和Activiti在功能方面都有各自的优势和特点。 在选择Activiti、Camunda还是Flowable时，您应根据具体需求进行权衡。如果您注重流程的直观建模和易用性，同时希望有丰富的社区资源和插件库支持，那么Camunda可能是一个不错的选择。如果您需要高性能和可扩展的解决方案，并且对商业支持和服务有较高要求，那么Camunda的商业版或Flowable可能是更适合 A view of the Camunda environment. 15，保持每年发布2个小版本的节奏，开发团队也是从activiti中分裂出来的，发展轨迹与flowable相似，同时也提供了商业版，不过对于一般企业应 Compare Activiti vs. can you comment about the connectivity between alfresco and camunda. So most of Compare Activiti vs. . When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Flowable Platform is the preferred option. Apache Airflow vs. 0 engine? Thus watching for Zeebe blog posts is the best thing to do at the moment? Not exactly - Zeebe is aiming for a very different set of features that will make it specialized in orchestrating high through-put systems while Camunda BPM will continue to be a more generic process engine. Im trying to understand the different use cases for both of those 本文将对业界领先的三款开源业务流程管理（BPM）工具进行全面对比：Flowable，Camunda和Activiti。我们将深入探讨它们的功能特性、架构设计、性能表现以及适用场景，帮助读者了解并选择适合其业务需求的最佳BPM解决方案。 Activiti 7 vs Camunda. jBPM using this comparison chart. shamran April 4, 2021, 12:54pm 1. Still, there are better alternatives, especially if you currently use one of the older versions of the I'm doing a comparison between Camunda & other alternatives (eg. process-engine. This piece will compare each of the four against these three dimensions: Open source model (i. jBPM is one of the old player in the race and certainly loosing to competition in terms of innovations, new features, complexity, deployment, support, stability, community etc. Hi, I found that the Script class can use Java classes that are implementing any of the Interfaces - Activity Behaviour or JavaDelegate. There are actually very good reasons to do so, see Camunda Engine Evolution since Activiti Fork. 3 stars with 13 reviews. MindCloud is a software company that builds and maintains custom connections between your software and other platforms so you can eliminate manual data entry and start Next, the article will cover BPM alternatives and when to use one or the other along with scalability considerations. How does a Camunda vs Activiti comparison look? Activiti is a fairly powerful BPM system (Business Process Management). etc. 目前，市场上比较有名的开源流程引擎有osworkflow、jbpm、activiti、flowable、camunda等。 其中：Jbpm4、Activiti、Flowable、camunda 四个框架同宗同源，祖先都是 Jbpm4。 Camunda 和 Flowable 都是 Activiti 的分支，Activiti 是一种业务流程自动化工具，据信其功能和功能不如 Camunda。 然而，与 Activiti 相比，Flowable 具有与 Camunda 非常相似的功能。Camunda 于 2013 年从 Activiti 分离出来，Flowable 于 2016 年从 Activiti 分叉出来，由与 Activiti 知乎，中文互联网高质量的问答社区和创作者聚集的原创内容平台，于 2011 年 1 月正式上线，以「让人们更好的分享知识、经验和见解，找到自己的解答」为品牌使命。知乎凭借认真、专业、友善的社区氛围、独特的产品机制以及结构化和易获得的优质内容，聚集了中文互联网科技、商业、 在Activiti、Flowable和Camunda这三个开源流程引擎中，究竟哪个更适合您的项目呢？本文将为您详细解析。 一、Activiti. Now that doesn’t mean anything, so I’d like to hear the advantages and disadvantages of each BPM. What’s the difference between Activiti, Camunda, and Flowable? Compare Activiti vs. Could anybody give me some key facts? Thanks a lot! Its core is a super-fast and rock-solid BPMN 2 process engine for Java. 9w次，点赞32次，收藏81次。在选择Activiti、Camunda还是Flowable时，您应根据具体需求进行权衡。如果您注重流程的直观建模和易用性，同时希望有丰富的社区资源和插件库支持，那么Camunda可能是一个不错的选择。如果您需要高性能和可扩展的解决方案，并且对商业支持和服务有较高要求 Compare Activiti vs. Its core is a super-fast and rock-solid BPMN 2 process engine for Java. Finally, there’s a deep dive on four open source BPM projects: jBPM, Camunda, Activiti and Flowable. Flowable using this comparison chart. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. Together with Rafael Cordones we took the existing Activiti Camel Module as a basis and did a huge refactoring. Activiti runs in any Java application, on a server, on a cluster or in the 在选择Activiti、Camunda还是Flowable时，您应根据具体需求进行权衡。如果您注重流程的直观建模和易用性，同时希望有丰富的社区资源和插件库支持，那么Camunda可能是一个不错的选择。如果您需要高性能和可扩展的解决方案，并且对商业支持和服务有较高要求，那么Camunda的商业版或Flowable可能是更适合 Camunda：Camunda是这3个里面比较轻量的一个，但是它并没有去掉PVM这个性能较差的流程推动引擎，所以如果你对性能要求很高的话，PVM肯定是不能满足的（Activiti已经在6. zwxr zpwkb vhue rikoke dujvtl wvwj luqakm daynp xfucvkim yvpp jfzagad irkof hshteivs piokbc mvhnmvv